Translate

martes, 6 de enero de 2026

THE LIBRARY OF ASHURBANIPAL



ANA  MARIA  SEGHESSO


                                 

                         ASHURBANIPAL


The Library of Ashurbanipal was located in Nineveh, an Assyrian city, belonging to King Ashurbanipal, who reigned in the 7th century BC. It consisted of a collection of clay tablets written in cuneiform script, the oldest known writing system. In the 19th century, an English archaeologist discovered the remains of the library and took the tablets, more than 20,000 of them, to the British Museum. This marked the beginning of excavations that continued for several years and, in the 20th century, led to the understanding and dissemination of the highly refined Sumerian culture. At least 4,000 tablets contain astrological predictions based on astronomical and meteorological observations prior to 2000 BC.





              CUNEIFORM  TEXT


They are not limited to astrological predictions; they cover a wide range of subjects, including grammar, lists of cities, mathematics and astronomy, literature, art, history, and religion. Excavations in the Middle East, carried out by American and European scholars, have uncovered an unexpected treasure, significantly extending the boundaries of Antiquity. "In Sumer, more than a thousand years before the Hebrews wrote the first books of the Bible and the Greeks the Iliad and the Odyssey, a brilliant literature already exists, composed of myths, epics, hymns, and laments, as well as numerous collections of proverbs, fables, and essays. It is not unreasonable to predict that the recovery and reconstruction of this ancient literature, so long lost to oblivion, will be one of the greatest contributions of our century to our understanding of the origins of history." "It is fascinating for the decipherer of terracotta tablets, for the translator of cuneiform texts, to trace the path of ideas and works through these ancient civilizations, from the Sumerians to the Babylonians and from the Assyrians to the Hittites, Hurrians, and Arameans." “The Sumerians did not exert a direct influence on the Hebrews, since they disappeared long before the latter entered history.” But there is no doubt that they influenced the Canaanites, who preceded the Jews in Palestine. This is the only possible explanation for the numerous analogies discovered between Sumerian texts and the books of the Bible. The analogies are not isolated but are found in series; it is therefore a true parallelism.” [1]




           ASHURBANIPAL 


The primordial waters, the separation of Heaven and Earth, the clay from which humankind was molded, moral and civil laws, the manifestation of suffering and resignation among mortals—all these themes were addressed by the Sumerians before any other civilization. 

They foreshadowed the fundamental tenets of all subsequent religions, both monotheistic and polytheistic. 


          ENKI AND NINHURSAG 


The Sumerian mythical poem, "Enki and Ninhursag," tells of the paradise created by the gods in the land of Dilmun. The poem recounts that there is a region called Dilmun; it is a pure, limpid, and radiant place, where neither sickness nor death reigns. 


However, something is lacking in Dilmun: fresh water, essential for animals and plants. Enki, the Sumerian god of fresh water and wisdom, commands Utu, the sun god, to bring forth water and abundantly irrigate the land. Dilmun thus becomes a splendid garden. 


The Great Mother Goddess Ninhursag, after generating the divinity of flowing water and three generations of goddesses, causes eight plants to grow in the paradise of the gods. 


The plants possess the power to enable the goddess's procreation and fertility. The poem highlights the fact that Ninhursag's childbirths were painless. Enki, curious to know the taste of the plants—or perhaps to seize female fertility—has them gathered by his messenger, Isimud, and then eats them, one after the other. Ninhursag, outraged by the theft of her plants, curses him and leaves paradise. 


The ingested plants have the quality of generating new beings, but in a womb, and since Enki does not possess one, eight parts of his body, which correspond to the eight plants, suffer poisoning.



                           ENKI


Enlil, god of the air and the principal male deity of the Sumerians, is also unable to cope with the situation. Only Ninhursag possesses the greater power to create life and save Enki from death. 


A new character intervenes: the fox, who negotiates with Enlil, promising that for a reasonable sum, he will convince the goddess to return. Enlil agrees. It is not known how the fox did it; some lines are missing from the narrative, but Ninhursag returns among the gods. Meanwhile, Enki is on the verge of death. 


The goddess has him sit beside her and asks him which part of his body is causing him pain, and Enki tells her, one by one. Ninhursag then creates eight deities to heal the eight illnesses afflicting Enki. 



        

                           ENKI



The goddess possesses greater power than the other gods of the pantheon, and she uses it. This is the plot of the Sumerian myth. The similarity to the Myth of Paradise, written a thousand years later.

 According to tradition, Jehovah planted a garden in the east, in Eden, and there he placed the man he had formed. “A river flowed out of Eden to water the garden, and from there it divided into four headwaters.” 

Genesis 2:10 


The sin committed by Enki in stealing the eight plants of Ninhursag evokes the sin committed by Adam and Eve, eating the forbidden fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. 



                  MICHELANGELO



The reaction to disobedience:


 “I will greatly increase your pains in childbearing; with pain you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”




Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, “You must not eat from it,” Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life. It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. 


By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return. The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever. 





Therefore the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. - So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubim, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to guard the way to the tree of life. Michelangelo Buonarroti The modern ideology of monotheistic religions is far removed from the Sumerian doctrine. - 


A state inferior to that described in the Sumerian text is evident, where women gave birth without suffering. - The wrath of the monotheistic god is expressed in curses against his creatures. - The pagan goddess is moved by Enki and does not allow his death. 


The codes of conduct created by pagan culture and the foundation of its religion have varied considerably in monotheistic religions. 






(1) “I Sumeri”. Samuel N. Kramer. Grandi Tascabili Economici Newton, 1997.




 

domingo, 7 de diciembre de 2025

THE PAGAN CELEBRATION OF THE SUN

ANA MARÍA SEGHESSO



                           Emperors with the solar crown
                                         like the Unconquered Sun








Between December 22nd and 25th in the Northern Hemisphere, the hours of darkness reach their maximum relative to the hours of daylight. From the 25th onward, daylight gradually increases, following the Winter Solstice, a circumstance that the ancient Romans celebrated with the Rite of the Birth of the Unconquered SunDies Natalis Solis Invicti – the god of Light destined to triumph over the darkness of evil.


Several solar deities with the role of saviors of humanity, such as Mithras, Helios, and El-Gabal, represented the Sun in their respective religions.


El-Gabal, in its Latinized form Elagabal or Elagabalus, was an ancient Syrian solar deity whose cult arrived in Rome during the reign of the Roman emperor Elagabalus, at the beginning of the 3rd century AD.


Al-Gabal was originally venerated in the Syrian city of Emesa.


The birth of Christ has been placed in that period three centuries after his actual birth, although it is true that this date is not mentioned anywhere in the Gospels.


The feast of Christmas was instituted by Constantine the Great, according to a Roman historian and chronographer, Furius Dionysius Philocalus, in an almanac where the following entry appears:


“Eighth day before the Kalends of January (December 25): Christ, born in Bethlehem of Judea.”



Constantine integrated Christianity—previously persecuted—as the religion of the Roman state. After experimenting with various popular religions, he settled on the cult of the Sun, perhaps the most popular among the majority of the population. 


The emperor needed to adopt a religion that would serve the political needs of Rome, which was on the verge of disintegration due to continuous attacks both within and beyond its borders. 







Thus, he adopted a strategy to forge a new order in the Empire—a political, spiritual, military, and economic order—by merging the Church, Stoic philosophy, and the Roman State. One of the consequences of this new religious order was the different way of measuring time, inspired by religion, as the celebrations of the Empire began to be replaced by Christian celebrations. 


The basic Julian calendar—365 days and 6 hours, divided into twelve months—remained unchanged, but introduced three modifications to its organization: - Sunday as a holy day - the seven-day week - the official celebration of fixed or solar festivals, such as Christmas, and movable or lunar festivals, such as Easter.





Sunday was adopted as the first day of the week, a concept unknown to the Romans, who used a different system based on the Kalends (beginning of the month, new moon), Nones (first quarter of the moon), and Ides (full moon).


Sunday, called Sol Diem or Dies Solis (Day of the Sun), was decreed by Constantine as a day of rest on which no work was to be done. Later, the name Dies Solis was replaced in the Romance languages by Dies dominicus or Day of the Lord, as in the Italian Domenica and the French Dimanche


In other languages, its original meaning was retained, such as the English Sunday, the German Sonntag, and the Danish Søndag


The Constantinian week quickly gained popularity among the Romans, partly because the days coincided with the names of the Roman gods and their astrological and astronomical significances: five for the known planets, in addition to the Sun and the Moon. 



                          ASTROLOGICAL CHART


Christian jurists, bishops, and priests, not entirely in agreement with the pagan meaning of the Sun, tried to justify the Emperor's decision by emphasizing the concept that Christ, like the Sun, was the light of the world.





                                              RELIEF

                                          VATICAN MUSEUMS


  





- Sol Invictus ("unconquered sun") or, in its full form, 
Deus Sol Invictus (Latin, "the invincible Sun God"), 
was a religious title applied to at least three distinct 
deities during the Roman Empire: El Gabal, Mithras, 
and Sol.


- Julian the Apostate, Roman emperor, declared 
Helios the sole deity, with the other deities being 
manifestations of this god. 
During his reign, the religion of the Sun became 
the official religion of Rome.
 
 

- Chronography: The science of determining the order and dates of historical events.                         









sábado, 22 de noviembre de 2025

UNA BATALLA ANACRÓNICA

 


DIÁLOGOS SOBRE LOS DOS MÁXIMOS SISTEMAS DEL  MUNDO


    



 



 Es un diálogo escrito por Galileo Galilei en el que debate sobre el movimiento del universo en torno al sol. El libro fue publicado en Florencia el 22 de febrero de 1632 en italiano.

El concepto de Heliocentrismo habia sido ya adoptado por muchas civilizaciones, pero la Europa del siglo XVII no lo aceptaba


Este libro generó una fuerte polémica al cuestionar el paradigma existente sobre el movimiento de la Tierra y se transformó en una acusación formal por «sospechas graves de herejía» ante la Inquisición y posterior condena del autor. 


El libro fue a continuación incluido en el Index de publicaciones prohibidas, del cual no fue eliminado hasta 1822. 




En este libro —escrito con fines divulgativos en italiano y no en el latín usual de la bibliografía académica de la época— el diálogo se desarrolla en Venecia durante cuatro jornadas entre tres interlocutores sobre las visiones aristotélico- ptolemaica y copernicana del Universo.






Mientras escribía el libro, Galileo se refería a la obra como el Diálogo sobre las mareas, y este fue el título con el que lo presentó a la Inquisición al pedir su aprobación: Diálogo sobre la bajamar y el flujo de los mares. 


Se le ordenó suprimir toda mención a las mareas del título y cambiar el prefacio, con el argumento de que dar permiso para ese título implicaría aprobar la teoría subyacente sobre el referido fenómeno, que intentaba demostrar el movimiento de la Tierra desde un punto de vista puramente físico. 


Como resultado, el título formal fue reducido a Diálogo, seguido del nombre de Galileo y sus cargos académicos, con un largo subtítulo a continuación. El nombre con que se ha usualmente conocido a la obra proviene de un subpárrafo de ese largo subtítulo. 


A pesar de que el libro está presentado formalmente como una consideración de ambos sistemas —no hubiera obtenido aprobación de no haber sido así— no hay duda de que el desarrollo de los argumentos copernicanos obtiene y por mucho las preferencias del autor. 


El personaje de Simplicio claramente se encuentra superado en inteligencia e información por el de Salviati y esta desventaja se translada directamente al resultado del debate. 



El diálogo no trata los aportes del Sistema tychónico, que era considerado como el preferido de la Iglesia católica al momento de su publicación. El sistema de Tycho Brahe tiene un tratamiento matemático similar al copernicano, y no había en ese tiempo alguna prueba empírica de su invalidez. Como ilustra su correspondencia personal, Galileo nunca tomó en serio a los desarrollos de Tycho, descalificándolos como un compromiso inadecuado y poco satisfactorio. 


Una razón de la ausencia del sistema de Tycho en la obra —a pesar de muchas referencias al danés y a su trabajo— se puede buscar en la teoría de Galileo de las mareas, que proporcionaron el título original y el principio de organización del diálogo. 





Mientras que los sistemas de Copérnico y de Tycho son equivalentes en geometría, son absolutamente diferentes desde el punto de vista de la dinámica. 


La teoría de mareas de Galileo exigía el movimiento real y físico de la tierra; es decir, si hubiera sido válida, habría proporcionado la clase de prueba que el péndulo de Foucault realmente suministró dos siglos más tarde. 


Referente a la teoría de mareas de Galileo, no habría diferencia entre los sistemas de Ptolomeo y de Tycho. 

La discusión no se limita a los asuntos astronómicos, sino que se extiende sobre buena parte de la ciencia contemporánea. 


La idea presentada en la cuarta jornada del libro, expone un
argumento equivocado, aunque brillante y propio del genio de  Galileo. 


Consiste en que el movimiento rotatorio de la Tierra,
al moverse en su traslación alrededor del Sol hace que los puntos situados en la superficie de la Tierra sufran aceleraciones y deceleraciones cada 12 horas, lo que, según él, sería la causa de las mareas. 


En esencia, el argumento es correcto, y dicha fuerza existe en realidad, si bien su intensidad es muchísimo menor que la que Galileo calcula, y no es la causa de las mareas.





                               GALILEO  GALILEI


El error proviene del desconocimiento de datos importantes como la distancia al Sol y la velocidad de la Tierra. 


Si bien estaba equivocado, Galileo desacreditó completamente la teoría del origen lunar de las fuerzas causantes de las mareas, por falta de explicación de su naturaleza, y por el problema de la explicación de la marea alta cuando la Luna está en sentido contrario, pues alega que la fuerza sería atractiva (para quien esté situado sobre la superficie de la Tierra orientada a la Luna) y repulsiva a la vez (para quienes estén situados en la superficie de la Tierra contraria a la Luna). 


Sería necesario esperar hasta Isaac Newton para resolver este problema, no sólo explicando el origen de la fuerza, sino también el cálculo diferencial para explicar el doble abultamiento. 


Pero, aún equivocada, situada en su contexto, la tesis de Galileo presentaba menos problemas y era más plausible en su explicación de las mareas.




El movimiento de Precesión de los equinoccios, descubierto milenios antes por los Sumerios, es un concepto mucho más sofisticado para aferrar que los movimientos de rotación y traslación, analizados por Galileo y descubiertos muchos siglos después en

 
Europa Occidental. 




"Alba y crepúsculo del sol" o Precesión de los

 equinoccios.



https://anaseghesso.blogspot.com/2015/11/alba-y-crepusculo-del-sol.html